Hearing Acuity and Equal Loudness Curves
By Amir Majidimehr
We hear many mentions of common audio terms like distortion and
frequency response yet there is comparably little discussion of one
of the most fundamental factors on how the human hearing system
works and its profound impact on performance of digital systems.
This is odd as the original research dates way back to 1933 at Bell
Labs where experiments were performed to understand the capabilities
of the human hearing system:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fletcher–Munson_curves.

The work is named after its researchers – Fletcher & Munson – and is
summed into a nice graph to the right.
What the lines show is the ear sensitivity at fixed level of sound
(pressure) level at different frequencies. Inverted, we realize that
to maintain equal perceived loudness, the level needs to drastically
rise at lower and higher frequencies. The ear is clearly most
sensitive to frequencies in the middle bands around 2KHz to 3 KHz.
This is probably due to our need to hear other humans well as the
frequency of our vocal cords is around the same range. It may also
have something to do with the early man being able to hear the
hidden danger from animals and such.
Lossy audio compression systems (e.g. MP3) universally use this
phenomenon to great effect to reduce the amount of storage needed
for a piece of music. They convert the audio samples into frequency
domain, and then assign less resolution to lower and higher
frequencies, saving bits to allocate to the critical mid-band
region. The effective resolution for example may be just 4 or 5 bits
at high frequencies whereas the entire 16-bits of CD audio samples
are preserved for mid frequencies. Reduced allocation of bits to low
and high frequencies causes distortion at those frequencies but
since the ear is less sensitive there, it will likely not be (very)
audible.
Getting far more esoteric, let’s say we are trying to understand an
artifact in digital audio reproduction called “jitter.” Jitter is a
variation in timing. Instead of every audio sample from a CD source
arriving precisely at 1/44100 of a second, some samples come
slightly earlier or faster. Debates range across the Internet as to
whether such variations cause audible distortion. Jitter is a
complex topic and one that I will cover at depth in another article
but for now, let’s accept that the factors that vary timing and
hence cause jitter have a frequency of their own. Understanding that
make up is super important in realizing if jitter can be audible or
not. Why? The answer is in the above graphs! If jitter frequency
lies in the 2 to 3Khz range, then it is far more likely to be
audible than not. So be dubious of tests which claim jitter is not
audible which were performed with frequencies outside of this range
(or worse yet, are devoid of what frequency was used). They run
afoul of the equal loudness curves.
One other interesting observation from the graphs. If you look at
them, you realize that they are not parallel to each other. This
means that depending on the level of the sound, the response of the
ear changes! For example, we are not as sensitive to low frequencies
at lower levels as higher levels. Old time audiophiles remember
“Loudness” switches on amplifiers designed to counteract this effect
by boosting the low frequencies.
A better solution than a loudness switch is to utilize the power of
signal processing in today’s processors to adaptively change the
system response to match that of the ear. In other words, the volume
control would not just change the volume but also shape the
frequency response to match the loudness curves. That way, the
volume control truly does what it is supposed to: change the volume
across all frequency bands equally. The way it is now, the frequency
response changes perceptively as you change the dial which is not
correct.
There is one room correction device which claims to have the above
feature: TacT. While that is laudable, a more perfect solution would
first test your hearing system, create custom equal loudness curves
for your ear (and compensate for losses in your hearing!) and adapt
to that, rather than what the research shows across many subjects.
In future installments, I will describe other “psychoacoustics” data
we have about human hearing system. So, “do come back, you hear?”
Back to Articles